+ NOUVEAU
Le rapport sur les compétences humaines vs IA 2026683 groupes de compétences testés avec des configurations IA.
Se connecterAide
Xobin
Commencer
Produits

Acquisition de talents

Entretiens avec l'IA et intégrité des tests

Bibliothèque d’évaluations

Compétences et simulations de poste

Sourcing, formulaires et opérations candidats

Personnalité et comportement

Marquage blanc

Communication et langue

Voir tout Acquisition de talents produits →

Gestion des talents

Performance, feedback et développement

Engagement et écoute

Conception organisationnelle et succession

Voir tout Gestion des talents produits →
Solutions

Par cas d'usage

Par secteur

Par service

Par secteur d’activité

À propos de nous
Ressources

Pourquoi Xobin

Apprendre et explorer

Modèles

Assistance

Recherche

Notre approche

Recherche

TarifsSe connecter

Entretiens de sortie

Recueillez des retours sincères expliquant pourquoi les gens partent réellement, afin que l’organisation apprenne de leur décision tant qu’elle peut encore aider ceux qui restent.

Réserver une démo

La confiance de plus de 5 000 clients dans le monde entier.

Xobin logoMR

Exit Interviews / Megan Whitfield Product Design

TranscriptExport

Exit interviews

1,864

last 12 months

Completion rate

92%

vs. 41% by form

Avg. duration

14m 05s

8 themes covered

Preventable exits

37%

flagged by Nura

Megan Whitfield participating in an exit interviewRec · 02:04Megan Whitfield · Sr. Product Designer · 3y 4m tenure

Nura AI interviewer

Probing follow-ups · neutral tone

Live

Question libraries

3 active

Growth & career path

12 questions

Leadership & management

10 questions

Team experience

9 questions

Exit pipeline

6 this month

Megan Whitfield

Product Design · Austin

Today

Andre Bowman

Customer Success · Denver

Sep 08

Priya Raman

Data Engineering · Remote

Sep 07

Cole Jennings

Sales · Chicago

Sep 05

Danielle Fox

Marketing · Boston

Sep 12

Exit conversation · Growth & career path

Anonymized in reporting
Thanks for making time, Megan. This is anonymous in reporting nothing here goes to your manager with your name on it.00:08
Appreciate that. Honestly, I've got a lot to say.00:21
Let's start with the decision itself. When did leaving first cross your mind?00:33
Around March. After the reorg my scope shrank and nobody explained why.00:47
Did you raise it with anyone at the time and what happened?01:02
I brought it up twice in 1:1s. It was acknowledged, then nothing changed for two quarters.01:18
If your scope had been restored in April, would you have stayed?01:36
Probably yes. The pay wasn't the reason the ceiling was.01:49
Nura is following up on the ceiling comment…

Sentiment across the conversation

Dips at reorg, recovers on candour

Attrition drivers

Q3 rollup

Career growth ceiling

42%

up 9 pts QoQ

Manager support

24%

flat

Role clarity after reorg

18%

up 6 pts

Compensation

11%

down 4 pts

Workload & pace

5%

down 2 pts

Signals captured

auto-tagged

Raised concern twice, no follow-up

01:18 · Manager follow-through

Scope reduced without explanation

00:47 · Reorg fallout

Counterfactual: would have stayed

01:49 · Preventable exit

Pay explicitly ruled out as driver

01:49 · Non-comp attrition

Recommended action

Design has lost 4 seniors to scope ceilings this quarter publish levelling criteria before the Q4 cycle.

“The pay wasn’t the reason the ceiling was.”