Still using HackerEarth for tech hiring and feeling stuck? You’re not alone. Many HR leaders and hiring managers grow frustrated with HackerEarth due to high costs, limited flexibility, inconsistent candidate experience, and missing AI-powered insights. As tech hiring shifts toward data-driven and candidate-friendly processes, using rigid or outdated software slows your hiring and affects the quality of talent. That’s why we put together this detailed and unbiased list of top HackerEarth alternatives.
Table of Contents
Through real-world comparisons, this guide highlights platforms that fix common hiring challenges while offering more customization and automation that leads to maximizing your recruitment ROI.
Whether you’re building tech teams fast or aiming to improve your employer brand, these alternatives deliver real hiring value. Each platform brings real value to the table to stay competitive in today’s job market.
Let’s explore the best HackerEarth competitors and help you make a smart, future-ready choice for your hiring strategy.
What is HackerEarth?
HackerEarth is a tech recruitment and developer assessment platform that enables companies to conduct remote coding tests, technical interviews, and virtual hackathons. It offers a vast library of coding challenges across multiple programming languages, helping recruiters evaluate technical skills efficiently. Primarily used by engineering teams, HackerEarth supports hiring through customizable assessments, real-time code evaluation, and analytics, aiming to streamline the technical recruitment process for businesses of all sizes.
Why Look for HackerEarth Alternatives?
HackerEarth is known in the technical hiring space. However, many companies are now exploring other options, as it lacks flexibility, smart features, and a smooth experience. As a result, it often fails to keep up with the expectations, leading to costly inefficiencies. That’s why it’s the right time to consider switching to a better alternative to HackerEarth.
High Pricing With Limited ROI
HackerEarth’s pricing often doesn’t scale well for growing businesses. For companies managing multi-role or high-volume recruitment, the platform’s pricing model can significantly inflate the cost per hire without delivering proportional value. Budget-conscious teams may find themselves paying more for less automation and limited customization.
Lack of AI-Driven Features
In a world of intelligent hiring, HackerEarth still relies heavily on manual workflows. It lacks advanced AI capabilities like automated candidate ranking, AI-generated candidate summaries, or intelligent video response evaluation. This increases recruiter workload and slows down the time-to-hire, especially when handling large applicant pools.
Subpar Candidate Experience
The assessment experience matters just as much as the outcome. Candidates often report friction points such as outdated UI, long loading times, and lack of mobile optimization. A poor candidate experience not only affects completion rates but also reflects poorly on your employer brand, especially in competitive tech markets.
Delayed or Inconsistent Support
Timely support is crucial during hiring sprints, but many users mention slow response times or inadequate guidance from HackerEarth’s customer support. When support falters, recruitment timelines stretch, and internal teams face avoidable delays.
Rigid Integrations and Workflow Inflexibility
Hiring today demands seamless integration with your ATS, CRM, and collaboration tools. HackerEarth’s limited and inflexible integrations make it harder to automate hiring workflows, leading to manual handoffs, data silos, and lost productivity.
10 Best HackerEarth Alternatives to Consider in 2025
Looking for better tools for coding assessments, AI automation, or improving candidate experience? Here are the top 10 HackerEarth alternatives that align with today’s tech hiring trends and transform recruitment.
1. Xobin
Xobin is an AI-powered coding assessment platform built for modern tech hiring. It helps companies evaluate candidates using smart automation, immersive coding simulators, and robust proctoring. With over 3,400 skill tests and 2,500 job-role-based assessments, Xobin ensures faster, bias-free, and scalable recruitment for organizations of all sizes.
Best For mid-sized to large enterprises, fast-scaling startups, and hiring teams across tech, BPO, banking, and consulting industries. Especially useful for teams handling high-volume campus hiring or global recruitment.
Features of Xobin
- AI-Based Answer Evaluation using LLMs for instant and consistent grading
- Real-time coding simulators for immersive technical testing across 40+ languages
- Xobin Copilot automates JDs, assessments, offer letters & workflows.
- AI Interviewer Agent for automated candidate interviews
- Virtual Recruiter Agent to screen candidates via WhatsApp/phone and rank fitment
- AI Resume Parser & Fitment Score for intelligent shortlisting
- Advanced web proctoring with face tracking, voice detection & anti-cheating tech
- Psychometric testing for behavioral and cultural fit assessments
- AI-Based Communication Checker in English and 15+ Languages
- Intelligent, multi-stage applicant tracking system (Xobin Tracks)
- Xolock Secure Browser for lockdown-mode test environment
- AI-Generated Assessment Builder to create job-relevant tests from just a JD
- Auto-generated candidate summaries with benchmarks
Pros
- Highly customizable test creation.
- Industry-leading AI automation for evaluation and screening.
- All-in-one AI hiring suite beyond just coding tests.
- 24/7 agentic interviews and outreach.
- Enterprise-grade proctoring and security.
Cons
- Advanced AI features may be overwhelming for small teams, but it’s affordable!.
Why It’s a Great HackerEarth Alternative?
Unlike HackerEarth, which lacks depth in AI automation and still relies on semi-manual scoring, Xobin offers end-to-end AI-powered workflows from resume screening to AI interviews. While HackerEarth can be limited in customization, Xobin delivers flexible assessment creation, AI question analysis, and behavioral testing.
In addition to that, its enterprise-level proctored assessments prevent cheating, adaptive skills assessments, and integrated ATS clearly explain why 5000+ companies across the globe prefer Xobin for modern hiring.
Free Trial? Yes, Xobin offers a free trial and live demo sessions for businesses to explore the platform. Book your free demo today and experience AI-driven hiring like never before.
2. Codility
Codility helps tech recruiters and hiring managers evaluate developer skills at scale through coding assessments. It offers robust tools for screening, interviewing, and onboarding candidates with a focus on coding proficiency and real-world problem-solving. Used by major tech companies, Codility supports remote hiring through reliable, secure, and scalable technical assessments.
Best For mid-to-large tech teams hiring software developers, especially when technical interviews and code quality evaluation are critical. Great for enterprise-grade hiring in industries like SaaS, fintech, and engineering.
Features of Codility
- Library of 500+ coding tasks across languages and frameworks
- Real-life scenarios with CodeLive for collaborative interviews
- Plagiarism detection and robust anti-cheating mechanisms
- Benchmark scoring and role-based testing templates
- Seamless ATS integrations (Greenhouse, Lever, etc.)
- Custom test creation with scoring rubrics
- Global candidate support and timezone management
- Analytics for team-wide hiring performance
Pros
- Strong test integrity and plagiarism checks.
- The real-time pair programming tool (CodeLive) is intuitive.
- Supports multiple programming languages and custom tasks.
- Fast setup and integration with common ATS platforms.
Cons
- Lacks advanced proctoring (like face tracking or voice detection).
- Less customizable than competitors.
- Limited non-technical or psychometric assessments.
- Pricier for startups or small teams.
Best For mid-to-large tech teams hiring software developers, especially when technical interviews and code quality evaluation are critical. Great for enterprise-grade hiring in industries like SaaS, fintech, and engineering.
Why It’s a Great Alternative?
Codility excels where HackerEarth may fall short in real-time collaboration and test integrity. Its CodeLive platform offers smoother pair programming experiences, and its benchmarking tools make it easier to compare developer performance. Unlike HackerEarth, it focuses deeply on code quality and engineering simulations, not just MCQs or generic challenges.
Free Trial? No public free trial, but Codility offers custom demo sessions and may provide a pilot upon request.
3. TestDome
TestDome offers an online pre-employment testing tool that lets employers quickly screen candidates for programming, IT, business, and other job-based skills. It uses real-world, work-sample tests to help shortlist only the most skilled applicants. This platform suits hiring managers who want fast, fair, and trustworthy hiring results.
Best For small to mid-sized tech teams, startups, and businesses hiring for roles in software development, finance, accounting, and customer support. It’s best suited for companies that want straightforward testing without the bloat.
Features of TestDome
- Real-world, work-sample-based questions
- Wide library of programming, business, and soft skill tests
- Anti-cheating features like webcam monitoring and copy-paste detection
- Custom test creation and question authoring
- Easy test-sharing via public links
- Auto-scored assessments with detailed reports
- ATS and API integrations
- No-login test experience for candidates
Pros
- Highly accurate and relevant test questions.
- Simple, intuitive UI.
- Strong plagiarism detection.
- Efficient for screening large applicant pools.
Cons
- Limited psychometric or behavioral testing.
- Fewer collaborative or live coding options.
- Basic UI compared to competitors.
Why It’s a Great Alternative?
Unlike HackerEarth, which often focuses heavily on competitive programming, TestDome provides practical, real-world questions tailored to job readiness. It avoids unnecessary gamification and instead offers reliable, cheat-proof assessments ideal for time-constrained hiring teams.
Free Trial? Yes, TestDome offers a limited free trial with sample questions and test creation.
4. LeetCode
LeetCode is a platform for coding challenges, interview prep, and competitive programming. Its large problem library and engaged community help developers improve their coding skills and get ready for technical interviews at top tech firms across the globe.
Best For individual developers, students, and small engineering teams focused on technical upskilling, competitive programming, or interview preparation. Ideal for candidates preparing for coding rounds or internships in the tech industry.
Features of LeetCode
- 2,600+ coding challenges across various difficulty levels
- Company-specific interview questions (Google, Amazon, etc.)
- Weekly and biweekly coding contests
- Discussion forums and community solutions
- Detailed problem tags and solution breakdowns
- Premium subscription with mock interview tools
- Workspace for real-time coding practice
- Support for multiple programming languages
Pros
- Excellent for self-paced interview prep.
- High-quality problems curated by experts.
- Large active community and rich discussion boards.
- Regular contests build real-world coding experience.
Cons
- Limited hiring features for recruiters compared to other platforms.
- Not a complete hiring solution; more focused on learners and job seekers.
- Premium features locked behind a paywall.
Why It’s a Great Alternative?
Unlike HackerEarth, which often feels bloated and hard to navigate, LeetCode offers a clean and focused platform for coding practice. Its well-curated problem sets and strong community support help users prepare better for technical interviews. It avoids unnecessary hiring workflows, so learners face fewer complexities.
Free Trial? Yes, LeetCode provides free access to many problems. Premium features are available via paid subscription, but basic functionality is robust even without payment.
5. DevSkiller
DevSkiller is a technical assessment platform designed to evaluate real-life coding skills using role-specific tests. It stands out with its RealLifeTesting™ methodology, allowing companies to assess candidates using tasks that simulate on-the-job challenges.
Best For tech hiring teams in enterprises and agencies that want to simulate real project scenarios. Best suited for mid- to large-sized teams hiring backend, frontend, or full-stack developers.
Features of DevSkiller
- RealLifeTesting™ for real-world coding environments
- Customizable assessments by job role or skill
- Support for 60+ technologies and frameworks
- Integration with major ATS platforms
- Plagiarism detection and security features
- Automated scoring and reporting
- Live coding interview support
- Candidate benchmarking and analytics
Pros
- Strong emphasis on job-relevant skills.
- Effective for mid- to senior-level developer roles.
- Easy to integrate into existing hiring workflows.
- Comprehensive analytics for better hiring decisions.
Cons
- Limited library compared to broader platforms like HackerRank.
- May require some technical setup for custom tests.
Why It’s a Great Alternative?
Compared to HackerEarth’s sometimes theoretical testing environment, DevSkiller offers more practical, job-like coding tasks. This leads to better insights into real-world performance and reduces hiring mismatches.
Free Trial? Yes, DevSkiller provides a free trial that includes access to basic features.
6. Coderbyte
Coderbyte is a web-based technical assessment platform that helps companies evaluate developer skills through coding challenges, assessments, and interview tools. It’s known for its simplicity and versatility, making it suitable for both startups and larger hiring teams.
Best for startups, SMBs, and educational institutions that hire entry-level tech talent or run coding bootcamps. It also helps screen interns and junior developers.
Features of Coderbyte
- 500+ coding challenges and algorithmic problems
- Custom assessment creation and question library
- Real-time code editor and compiler
- Built-in plagiarism detection
- Video interviewing and code-pairing tools
- Whiteboard interviews for live sessions
- Support for over 30 programming languages
- Team performance benchmarking and reporting
Pros
- Easy-to-use interface with rapid test deployment.
- Strong support for early-stage hiring and internships.
- Affordable compared to enterprise-grade tools.
- Responsive customer support.
Cons
- Lacks advanced AI insights and automation features.
- Limited proctoring capabilities.
- Smaller question library than competitors like HackerRank.
Why It’s a Great Alternative?
Compared to HackerEarth’s sometimes clunky UI and limited flexibility, Coderbyte offers a more intuitive and agile experience. It’s faster to set up, more affordable, and better suited for companies that need quick assessments without complex workflows.
Free Trial? Yes, Coderbyte offers a free trial with limited access to features for evaluation purposes.
7. CodeSignal
CodeSignal is a platform designed for technical hiring. It helps companies test candidates through coding tasks, virtual interviews, and gamified challenges. With its focus on standard tests and user-friendly tools, CodeSignal supports fast-growing startups and trusted enterprise tech companies alike.
Best For large enterprises and hyper-growth startups with a strong focus on consistent, high-volume technical hiring, especially for engineering and data science roles.
Features of CodeSignal
- General Coding Assessment (GCA) for standardized evaluation
- Real-time coding interview environment
- Role-specific assessments for front-end, back-end, and data roles
- Proctoring with video monitoring and plagiarism detection
- Pre-built test library for quick deployment
- Analytics dashboard with benchmarking capabilities
- Integration with ATS platforms
- Candidate feedback and test performance insights
Pros
- Great user interface for both candidates and recruiters.
- Effective standardized scoring helps reduce bias.
- Strong proctoring features ensure test integrity.
- Scalable for large enterprise hiring.
Cons
- Onboarding can be complex for small teams.
- GCA may not always reflect job-specific performance.
- Cost may be higher compared to leaner platforms.
Why It’s a Great Alternative?
HackerEarth often lacks a standardized scoring mechanism and user-friendly interface, which can hinder consistency in high-volume hiring. CodeSignal addresses both with its General Coding Assessment and modern UX, offering a more reliable, enterprise-grade hiring experience.
Free Trial? CodeSignal does not offer a public free trial but provides demos and custom pricing on request.
8. HackerRank
HackerRank offers a widely used platform that helps companies hire technical talent by testing developer skills through coding tests, challenges, and virtual interviews. It covers many programming languages and lets recruiters assess candidates at scale through real-world coding simulations and standardized evaluations.
Best For large enterprises, global recruiting teams, and tech organizations hiring at scale, especially when assessing junior- to mid-level engineers.
Features of HackerRank
- Extensive coding question library (2,000+ problems)
- Role-specific assessments for 30+ job functions
- CodePair: real-time collaborative coding interviews
- Skill-based certifications and ranking system
- Plagiarism detection and test integrity tools
- ATS integration and candidate pipeline management
- Custom test creation with scoring automation
- AI insights for performance benchmarking
Pros
- Large, curated library for various roles and experience levels.
- Real-time interview collaboration via CodePair.
- Strong community and developer engagement.
- Widely trusted by large enterprises.
Cons
- High pricing plans for scaling companies.
- Candidate experience can be impersonal or rigid.
- Limited customization for advanced assessments.
- Occasional false flags in plagiarism checks.
Why It’s a Great Alternative?
If you’re moving away from HackerEarth due to limited candidate engagement or test rigidity, HackerRank offers broader test libraries and more interactive interview tools. However, it shares some of HackerEarth’s drawbacks, like high cost and less personalization.
Free Trial? HackerRank offers a limited free trial with restricted access to its features.
9. Qualified.io
Qualified.io is a developer assessment platform that enables companies to evaluate coding skills through real-world challenges and collaborative code reviews. Designed with both recruiters and engineering teams in mind, it focuses on delivering accurate, role-specific insights to make smarter hiring decisions.
Best For mid-sized to enterprise software teams, especially in product-based tech companies that value code quality, collaboration, and team fit during the hiring process.
Features of Qualified.io
- Real-world project-based coding assessments
- Pair-programming interview environment
- Code review scoring and feedback tools
- Support for multiple languages and frameworks
- Benchmarking against team or industry standards
- ATS and Slack integrations
- Custom branding for candidate experience
- Detailed reporting and analytics dashboard
Pros
- Great for evaluating actual job performance.
- Strong collaboration features for pair interviews.
- Clean interface and customizable test workflows.
- Offers insights beyond just code correctness.
Cons
- Smaller question bank compared to some larger platforms.
- Limited non-coding assessment options.
Why It’s a Great Alternative?
Unlike HackerEarth, which often relies on generic algorithmic questions, Qualified.io emphasizes practical, work-simulated assessments. This makes it a stronger fit for evaluating how a developer would actually perform in a real engineering environment.
Free Trial? Yes, Qualified.io offers a free trial with demo access for evaluation.
10. CoderPad
CoderPad is a technical interview platform that enables collaborative, real-time coding interviews and assessments. Designed to simulate the natural coding environment, it helps hiring teams evaluate candidates’ problem-solving abilities in a more interactive and realistic way.
Best For small to mid-sized engineering teams that prioritize live interviews over automated testing. Commonly used by startups, product companies, and remote-first tech teams.
Features of CoderPad
- Real-time pair programming interviews
- Support for 40+ programming languages
- Built-in audio/video functionality
- Playback feature for session reviews
- Customizable take-home assignments
- Integrated code execution and testing
- Plagiarism detection tools
- Easy calendar and ATS integration
Pros
- Natural interview feel with a real coding environment.
- No need for setup; easy for both interviewers and candidates.
- Strong support for collaborative interviews.
- High candidate satisfaction rates.
Cons
- Limited pre-built assessments compared to others.
- Less ideal for bulk screening or automated evaluations.
- Some advanced proctoring features require third-party tools.
Why It’s a Great Alternative?
While HackerEarth relies heavily on preset tests and rigid workflows, CoderPad focuses on flexibility and live collaboration. For companies that value natural, discussion-based coding sessions, CoderPad offers a much more human-centric alternative.
Free Trial? Yes, CoderPad offers a free trial with limited interview sessions to explore its core features.
Make a Wise Choice and Choose the Best Alternative!
If you’re exploring HackerEarth competitors for better-quality hires, faster results, and improved candidate satisfaction, take a closer look at how these platforms help you hire top tech talent efficiently. Choose wisely! Picking the wrong tool in this GenAI era might let top candidates slip through.
FAQs
1. What is better than HackerEarth?
Platforms like Xobin, Codility, and CodeSignal offer better automation, analytics, and candidate experience.
2. Which HackerEarth alternative is AI-powered?
Xobin is fully AI-driven with automated scoring, ranking, and fraud detection.
3. Is HackerEarth free?
No, HackerEarth follows a subscription-based pricing model.
4. Why should I switch from HackerEarth?
Common reasons include pricing, lack of AI features, and rigid test setup.
5. How does Xobin compare to HackerEarth?
Xobin offers AI-based scoring, real-time analytics, better customization, and more intuitive workflows.
