Finding the right talent is one of the most critical challenges for HR teams and recruiters. Pre-employment testing platforms help organizations assess candidates’ skills, cognitive abilities, and personality traits to make informed hiring decisions. Criteria Corp is one of the widely used platforms in this space, but many companies are exploring alternatives that offer better usability, flexibility, and cost-efficiency.
Table of Contents
This blog highlights the top 10 Criteria Corp competitors and alternatives, why companies are considering them, and how they can enhance your hiring process.
What is Criteria Corp?
Criteria Corp is a US-based pre-employment assessment platform that helps companies evaluate candidates’ cognitive abilities, personality traits, and job-related skills. It is widely used by corporations, staffing agencies, and HR teams to streamline hiring and make data-driven recruitment decisions.
Core Features of Criteria Corp
- Pre-built aptitude, personality, and skills tests across roles
- Customizable assessments for specific job requirements
- Cognitive ability and behavioral evaluations
- Remote proctoring and secure candidate authentication
- ATS and HR system integrations
- Reporting and analytics dashboards with candidate insights
Market Credibility
Criteria Corp serves thousands of organizations globally and is recognized for its reliable assessments. It maintains an average rating of around 4.5/5 on G2 , with users appreciating its structured testing approach but noting areas for improved customization and user experience.
For a deeper understanding of Criteria Corp’s pricing, features, and value for money, check out our detailed page: Criteria Corp Pricing & Review
Why Companies Look for Criteria Corp Alternatives
While Criteria Corp is a trusted assessment platform, several organizations seek alternatives to address gaps in usability, flexibility, and cost-efficiency. Businesses are increasingly looking for solutions that provide a more modern experience, advanced analytics, and seamless integration with their existing HR workflows.
Common Reasons for Exploring Alternatives to Criteria Corp
- Limited Customization: Role-specific or industry-specific tests can be restrictive.
- Pricing Concerns: Higher costs can be challenging for small and mid-sized businesses.
- User Experience: Interface and navigation are less intuitive compared to newer platforms.
- Integration Limitations: Fewer ATS and HR system integration options.
- Support and Responsiveness: Some users report slower customer support response times.
Companies are increasingly opting for platforms that combine AI-driven assessments, predictive analytics, and extensive test libraries. This trend reflects the need for faster, smarter, and more cost-effective hiring solutions while ensuring a better candidate experience.
Top 10 Criteria Corp Competitors
Here are the best Criteria Corp competitors and alternatives you can consider:
1. Xobin
Xobin is a cutting-edge pre-employment assessment platform designed to streamline the hiring process. Trusted by over 5,000 companies worldwide, Xobin offers a comprehensive suite of tools for evaluating both technical and non-technical candidates. With its user-friendly interface and robust features, Xobin empowers HR teams to make data-driven hiring decisions efficiently.
Features of Xobin
- Access over 180,000 questions across 3,400+ skill-based tests and 2,500+ job role-based assessments.
- Assess candidates’ 100+ personality traits, behavioral traits and cognitive abilities with science-backed psychometric testing.
- Utilize advanced AI algorithms for real-time cheating detection, including eye-tracking and browser monitoring.
- Conduct on-demand interviews with AI-driven evaluations, eliminating scheduling conflicts.
- Customizable assessments to specific job roles and skill requirements, ensuring relevance.
- Seamlessly integrate with Applicant Tracking Systems for a streamlined recruitment workflow.
- Efficiently manage large-scale recruitment drives, particularly beneficial for campus hiring.
- Gain actionable insights into candidate performance through comprehensive reporting dashboards.
- White-label assessment solutions to align with your company’s identity.
- Conduct assessments in various languages, catering to a global talent pool.
Pros
- Highly intuitive design, facilitating ease of use.
- Automation reduces manual effort and speeds up the hiring process.
- Responsive and helpful support team, ensuring smooth operations.
- Suitable for both SMBs and large enterprises.
- Incorporation of AI for enhanced evaluation and proctoring.
Cons
- May require a learning curve for smaller HR teams, but the support and resources available mitigate this challenge.
Why Xobin Is a Great Alternative to Criteria Corp
While Criteria Corp offers basic pre-employment testing, it lacks the depth and flexibility that modern recruitment demands. Xobin addresses these gaps by providing a comprehensive suite of tools that not only assess technical skills but also evaluate behavioral traits, cultural fit, and cognitive abilities. Its AI-driven features, extensive question library, and seamless integrations make it a superior Criteria Corp alternative for organizations looking to enhance their hiring processes.
Free Trial? Yes, Xobin offers a free trial. Book a personalized demo today to explore our AI-driven features and assess Xobin’s suitability for your hiring processes without any initial investment.
2. ThriveMap
ThriveMap is a UK-based pre-employment assessment platform that specializes in creating realistic job previews through immersive, role-specific simulations. Designed primarily for entry-level and high-volume hiring, ThriveMap aims to improve candidate fit and reduce early-stage attrition by providing a transparent, “day-in-the-life” experience of the role.
Features of ThriveMap
- Realistic job assessments simulate actual tasks and challenges candidates will face on the job.
- Customizable assessments to reflect specific roles and company cultures.
- Smart Assessment Builder that quickly creates job-specific assessments with an intuitive interface.
- Candidate Self-Selection allows candidates to opt out if they feel the role isn’t a good fit.
- Seamlessly connects with applicant tracking systems like Greenhouse, Lever, and Workday.
- Provides analytics to inform hiring decisions and improve recruitment strategies.
- High-volume hiring support for screening large numbers of candidates efficiently.
Pros
- Candidates gain a clear understanding of job expectations, leading to better engagement.
- By accurately assessing job fit, organizations experience lower turnover rates.
- The platform’s efficiency reduces time-to-hire and recruitment costs.
- Flexibility to design assessments that align with specific role requirements.
- Compatible with various ATS platforms, facilitating smooth recruitment workflows.
Cons
- Primarily focuses on behavioral and situational simulations; lacks in-depth technical skill evaluations.
- Offers fewer pre-built tests compared to Xobin’s extensive library.
- Some users find the platform’s interface less user-friendly.
Why is ThriveMap a Great Alternative?
ThriveMap addresses several limitations of Criteria Corp, particularly in enhancing the candidate experience and improving retention rates. While Criteria Corp offers traditional assessments, ThriveMap’s immersive simulations provide candidates with a realistic preview of the job, leading to better job fit and reduced early-stage attrition. However, compared to Criteria Corp competitors, ThriveMap may offer fewer technical assessments and a less intuitive user interface.
Free Trial? ThriveMap does not offer a free trial. Interested parties can request a demo or explore their Smart Assessment Builder to evaluate the platform’s suitability for their needs.
3. Adaface
Adaface is an AI-driven assessment platform designed to evaluate candidates’ coding, aptitude, and psychometric skills through conversational tests. It aims to streamline the hiring process by providing an engaging candidate experience and objective evaluations.
Features of Adaface
- Conversational Assessments engages candidates with interactive, chat-based tests.
- Extensive Test Library offers over 500 ready-to-use tests across various domains.
- Advanced Proctoring includes AI cheating detection, webcam monitoring, and IP tracking.
- Customizable assessments allow the creation of tailored tests to suit specific job roles.
- Facilitates seamless integration with Applicant Tracking Systems.
- Real-Time Analytics provides detailed performance insights and benchmarking.
- User-friendly interface designed for ease of use by both recruiters and candidates.
Pros
- The conversational format reduces test anxiety and enhances user engagement.
- A wide range of tests across multiple domains aids in holistic candidate evaluation.
- Flexibility to tailor tests to specific job requirements.
Cons
- Some users find the interface less intuitive than competitors.
- Creating custom tests may require technical expertise, which could be a barrier for non-technical users.
- Focuses more on technical skills, with less emphasis on evaluating soft skills.
- While it offers ATS integration, the range of supported systems may not be as extensive as some competitors.
Why It’s a Great Alternative?
Adaface addresses several limitations of Criteria Corp by offering a more engaging candidate experience through its conversational assessments. It also provides a broader range of tests and advanced proctoring features, enhancing assessment integrity.
Free Trial? Adaface offers a free trial, allowing organizations to evaluate its features before committing to a subscription.
4. The Predictive Index
The Predictive Index (PI) is a behavioral and cognitive assessment platform designed to help organizations understand employee behavior, motivation, and cognitive abilities. It is widely used for hiring, team building, and leadership development.
Features of the Predictive Index
- Behavioral Assessments measures four key behavioral drives (Dominance, Extraversion, Patience, and Formality).
- Cognitive Ability Testing assesses general cognitive ability to predict learning capacity.
- Reference Profiles provides 17 predefined profiles to match candidates with job roles.
- Team Analytics offers insights into team dynamics and collaboration.
- Onboarding Tools assists in integrating new hires by aligning them with team expectations.
- Learning & Development supports leadership development and employee growth.
- Integration Capabilities connects with various HRIS and ATS platforms.
Pros
- User-friendly interface with intuitive navigation.
- Enhances understanding of team dynamics.
- Facilitates alignment of individual and team objectives.
- Provides insights into how well candidates align with job roles.
- Supports personalized development plans.
Cons
- Less flexibility in tailoring assessments to specific job roles.
- Manual administration of cognitive assessments can be time-consuming.
- Some users report challenges with generating detailed reports.
- Requires time to fully understand and utilize all features.
Why It’s a Great Alternative?
The Predictive Index offers robust behavioral and cognitive assessments, addressing some of Criteria Corp’s limitations, such as limited customization and integration options. However, compared to Xobin, PI may not provide the same level of technical skill assessments and coding tests, which are crucial for certain roles.
Free Trial? The Predictive Index does not explicitly offer a free trial. Interested organizations are encouraged to contact their sales team for more information on pricing and demonstration opportunities.
5. Wonderlic
Wonderlic is a US based pre-employment assessment platform designed to evaluate candidates’ cognitive abilities, personality traits, and motivations. Widely used across various industries, it aims to provide insights that assist in making informed hiring decisions.
Features of Wonderlic
- Cognitive Ability Assessment measures general intelligence through timed, multiple-choice questions.
- Personality Evaluation assesses traits based on the Big Five personality model.
- Motivational Insights gauges candidates’ work-related motivations.
- Job Fit Scoring matches candidates’ profiles to specific job roles.
- Customizable assessments to align with job requirements.
- Remote proctoring ensures test integrity through online monitoring.
- Multi-language support available in multiple languages for global reach.
Pros
- User-friendly interface simplifies test administration.
- Provides rapid feedback, aiding swift decision-making.
- Offers a holistic view of candidates’ abilities and traits.
- Suitable for both small businesses and large enterprises.
Cons
- Less flexibility in tailoring assessments for niche roles.
- Interfaces may feel dated compared to more modern platforms.
- Fewer integration options with Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS).
- Some candidates find the assessments lengthy and challenging.
Why It’s a Great Alternative?
Wonderlic offers a comprehensive approach to candidate evaluation, combining cognitive, personality, and motivational assessments. While it addresses some of Criteria Corp’s limitations, such as providing more holistic insights, it may not match Xobin’s level of customization and user experience. However, for organizations seeking a straightforward and established testing solution, Wonderlic presents a viable option.
Free Trial? Wonderlic does not explicitly advertise a free trial on its official website. Interested parties are encouraged to contact Wonderlic directly to inquire about trial options or demonstrations.
6. Plum
Plum is a talent assessment platform that uses psychometrics, soft-skills evaluation, and durable skills matching to help organizations assess cultural fit, work style, and potential beyond just resumes. The platform includes surveys, structured interview guides, and role-specific match scoring. It is designed to offer fair, accessible assessments, emphasizing candidate experience and bias reduction. Many companies use it to improve hiring quality and employee development.
Features of Plum
- Role Model™ match scoring that aligns durable soft skills with specific job roles.
- Structured interview guides tied to the durable skills needed for success.
- Bias audits and science-backed assessment methods grounded in I/O psychology.
- High candidate engagement/completion rate and multi-language support (21 languages).
- Free “Plum Profile”/Discovery Survey giving insights into what drives/drains users and soft-skill strengths, even if not hired.
Pros
- Easier setup of job/role profiles; good usability and intuitive tools for defining talent criteria.
- Strong on soft skills, psychological traits, durable skills, and matching for culture fit.
- Candidate experience tends to be positive; it gives useful feedback and insights even if the candidate isn’t selected.
Cons
- Some interview guides are generic; not all content is auto-generated, so there is more manual work for assessments in niche roles.
- Less strong for very technical skills/coding tests; may require additional tools for technical competencies.
- Reporting / admin side: some users say reporting is less detailed; search / filtering / navigation for admins could be improved.
Why It’s a Great Alternative?
Criteria Corp has been criticized in reviews for limited customization in test content for specific roles and for having less than ideal candidate experience in some cases. Plum directly addresses some of those issues by putting emphasis on durable skills and soft skills (which are often overlooked) and by giving candidates actionable feedback (drivers, drainers, etc.), which improves experience. It also supports role-specific match scoring and structured interview guides that are tied to job roles. If your organization feels constrained by rigid test formats from Criteria Corp, Plum offers a more flexible, human-centered approach.
Free Trial? Plum does not offer a “free version” of its full product. Pricing is by quote/enterprise license, and there is no fully open free trial for all features. However, it does provide a free “Plum Profile/Discovery Survey/Personality Test for individuals,” which gives insights (Big Five + soft skills, etc.), no credit card required.
7. iMocha
iMocha is an AI-powered skills assessment platform designed to help organizations evaluate candidates’ technical, cognitive, and soft skills. It offers a comprehensive suite of tools for recruitment, upskilling, and workforce planning.
Features of iMocha
- Extensive library covering technical, cognitive, and soft skills.
- Real-time coding assessments for evaluating programming skills.
- AI-enabled video, audio, and image proctoring to ensure assessment integrity.
- Patented pseudo-coding platform to assess logical thinking.
- Allows reviewers to see candidates’ coding process and thought patterns.
- Customizable assessments to suit specific job roles.
- Seamless integration with various ATS platforms.
Pros
- Comprehensive skill assessment library.
- Advanced proctoring features ensure secure testing.
- Real-time coding assessments with live feedback.
- User-friendly interface with intuitive navigation.
- Responsive customer support team.
Cons
- Customization of assessments may require assistance from support.
- Some users report challenges with test creation and formatting.
- Limited psychometric testing options.
- Integration with certain ATS platforms may require additional setup.
Why is it a Great Alternative?
iMocha addresses several limitations of Criteria Corp, such as offering a broader range of skill assessments and advanced proctoring features. However, it may not match the seamless user experience and integration capabilities of other online assessment platforms.
Free Trial? iMocha offers a demo upon request. For detailed pricing information, it’s best to contact iMocha directly.
8. Mercer Mettl
Mercer | Mettl is a cloud-based assessment platform used globally for talent measurement, hiring, skills evaluation, and learning & development. It provides secure, scalable assessments across cognitive, technical, and behavioral domains, with remote proctoring, exam tools, certification, and custom evaluation. Serving more than 6,000 clients in over 80 countries, it supports large-scale assessment needs while also catering to specific job roles and industries.
Features of Mercer Mettl
- Large question/content library across roles, industries, and skill types.
- Secure remote proctoring (AI + human + lockdown browser + monitoring tools) to reduce cheating.
- Customizable assessments and test types (including technical, cognitive, behavioral, and soft skills).
- Integration with LMS, ATS, and other platforms for exam conduct and user flows.
- Analytics and reporting dashboards to review candidate performance, test-taking behavior, and assessment outcomes.
- Scalable infrastructure, capable of handling high volumes of simultaneous assessments.
- Multi-use across hiring, learning/development, certification, and continuous feedback/360-degree tools.
Pros
- Secure proctoring, many assessment types, and good analytics. Users often praise the breadth of content.
- Handles large candidate volume and high-traffic exam situations.
- Broad global footprint, used in many countries; good for international or multilingual assessment needs.
Cons
- Can be more complex to configure; steeper learning curve for advanced customization. Xobin is often reported to be more intuitive.
- Cost tends to be higher for full-feature access, which may be a concern for smaller companies. Xobin often offers more flexible/affordable tiers.
- Some users report UI/user experience issues, e.g., navigation or report formatting may not be as polished as newer alternatives.
- For smaller usage volumes, features may feel like “overkill” or be underutilized; some premium features may be locked behind higher price points.
Why is it a great alternative?
Mercer | Mettl addresses several of Criteria Corp’s common weaknesses: it offers richer integration options (LMS, ATS, etc.), robust remote proctoring features, and a broader library of test types. For companies needing assessments at scale or a more secure environment, Mettl can fill gaps where Criteria Corp may feel limited in customization or in proctoring depth. However, in comparison to other Criteria Corp competitors, Mettl may lag in the simplicity of onboarding and intuitiveness of the user experience for non-technical users.
Free Trial? Yes, Mercer | Mettl offers trial/demo options for many of its assessment tools, including proctoring, exam management, etc.
9. TestGorilla
TestGorilla is a pre-employment assessment platform that offers a large library of skills, personality, and technical tests. It enables recruiters to combine built-in and custom test content, apply one-way video screening, and monitor test integrity via anti-cheating/proctoring tools. Many users find it helpful for making data-driven hiring decisions, especially when evaluating many applicants quickly.
Features of TestGorilla
- Over 300+ ready-made tests across technical, soft, and cognitive skills.
- Ability to create and mix custom test questions with existing templates.
- One-way video interviews/screening video responses.
- Anti-cheating mechanisms: proctoring, full-screen monitoring, periodic snapshots.
- Integrations with popular ATS systems to streamline candidate data flow.
- Reports & dashboards that compare candidates and visualize strengths/weaknesses.
Pros
- The interface is generally user-friendly and intuitive; many reviewers praise how easy it is to set up and send assessments.
- A large and diverse test library (soft skills + technical) enables broad screening.
- Strong anti-cheating/candidate integrity tools included.
Cons
- The subscription model often locks users into annual contracts, with limited flexibility or monthly payment options.
- Some reviewers report that technical tests can be too generic, not specific enough to reflect real-world developer tasks.
- The free trial is limited; full access to personality/technical assessment features is often withheld.
Why It’s a Good Alternative?
Criteria Corp is often criticized for limited customization, fewer integrations, and a less modern user experience. TestGorilla addresses many of these by offering a much larger and more varied test library, stronger anti-cheating tools, and smoother ATS integrations. It also tends to have a more modern user interface and quicker setup. Although in some features (especially detailed technical test realism or the flexibility of subscription models), it may not surpass Xobin, it still offers a solid upgrade over what some users think.
Free Trial? Yes, TestGorilla offers a free trial/free tier, but many users report that the trial is limited: some features (technical assessments, personality tests, or full test libraries) are locked or restricted during the trial.
10. Codility
Codility is a technical assessment platform focused on coding challenges, real-time test environments, plagiarism detection, and detailed performance reporting. It is used by engineering hiring teams to screen and evaluate candidates via automated and live coding tests. While strong in algorithmic and language support, its range of non-technical (behavioral, personality, culture-fit) testing is more limited compared to broader pre-employment assessment tools.
Features of Codility
- Distributed library of coding tasks in many programming languages.
- Automated scoring and real-time feedback on candidate code, including performance and complexity metrics.
- Strong cheating/plagiarism detection (hidden test cases, similarity detection, test playback).
- Live coding/pair programming/interactive interview environment.
- Integration with ATS and HR tech tools for smoother workflow.
- Detailed performance reports that show strengths, weaknesses, and candidate comparison.
- Customizable test templates and settings (timing, difficulty, tasks) to some extent
Pros
- Very strong coding/technical challenge capability, especially algorithmic tasks.
- Reliable anti-cheating and authenticity tools.
- Good reporting and analytics that help hiring managers understand candidate strengths/weaknesses.
- Wide language support and a robust environment for code execution.
Cons
- Less breadth in non-technical assessments (behavioral, personality, soft skills) compared to Xobin.
- Time pressure/strict time limits that can stress candidates and may favor speed over thoughtful problem solving.
- Customization of non-coding tests or deeply role-specific non-algorithmic tasks is more limited.
Why It’s a Great Alternative?
Codility addresses several of the shortcomings raised in Criteria Corp reviews: since Criteria Corp is often criticized for limited non-technical customization, weaker integration options, and higher cost for small firms, Codility provides a more specialized technical assessment environment, with strong cheating detection and real‐time coding tools. If your need is for evaluating engineering or programming tasks, Codility fills that gap more sharply than Criteria Corp might. However, Codility is less well suited for non-technical/psychometric testing or wider role fit assessments; Xobin tends to offer broader role-based tests and more flexibility for non-coding assessments.
Free Trial? Yes, Codility does offer a free trial.
Are you ready to switch from Criteria Corp?
If your organization is seeking more flexibility, advanced analytics, cost efficiency, and a better candidate experience, exploring other Criteria Corp competitors is a smart move. Platforms like Xobin, iMocha, and Plum provide modern interfaces, AI-driven insights, and extensive assessment libraries, helping you make informed hiring decisions faster.
Switching to a modern Criteria Corp alternative can streamline your hiring workflow, reduce operational bottlenecks, and ensure the right talent joins your team.
